The Best of Mens '08 (men.style.com is wrong)

Some words on what makes a collection "good" :

While menswear is certainly harder to do interestingly AND beautifully--as opposed to womenswear, where a designer can heighten the drama, experiment more with cut, proportion, silhouette, and the story of the show--some designers still manage to tell a story though their clothes, and still make them beautiful; the menswear scale goes from Calvin Klein (boring, functional, well-made clothes), to Thom Browne (theatrical, well-made, but not so wearable) just as in womenswear it would go from Calvin Klein (the master of boring) to Comme Des Garcons.

Logically, therefore, the best shows would synthesize theatrics with form and function. Don't get me wrong, I love Thom Browne, but you just can't wear this:

... Unless you actually are a conjoined twin. Now there's a niche market.

So here you have it, the best of the best of Fall/Winter '08 (and their best looks):

4. Lanvin

While there's not too much story here, the connecting elements such as the flowered lapels and general air of dandy make the collection complete. Designer Lucas Ossendrijver has his finger on the pulse with the new looser silhouette, and experiments elegantly with what looks like a double-breasted blazer that ties in the front. But then again, Lanvin always shows nice things.

Dandy plain and simple:

Here we see the new silhouette, cinched at the waist:


Here we have a highly structured, serious look offset by the playful exuberant blue bow tie. Fantastic:

Lucas Ossendrijver, himself, modeling his take on the double-breasted blazer:



3.Fendi

As previously discussed (See, Trendwatch 08' MEN, below) Fendi gets the new silhouette right, but also, there's some more experimentation with fur and cut. Everything is well done, simple, yet interesting.

Slouchy sweater with fur. So warm. There's nothing more to say:

The heavy fur trim gets all the attention, but one should not miss the neck of that shirt and the way that coat billows (not to mention that bag):

The cut of this coat is intensely interesting; I wonder how it opens/fastens:

2. Jil Sander:

We always see very basic things from Jil Sander, so it's very exciting to see very basic things go crazy: ridiculous patterns with the same old cuts. The show started with a few basic looks that one would look at and yawn, which preceded the upward spiral of ridiculous pattens for the rest of the show (The order of the looks provided narrative, coherence, sophistication):



Click on the picture to enlarge. Everything about this suit is fantastic. The high-neck shirt, the slim fit, and the moving-mable-rock affect. Stunning, really:

Here, We get humor with the very basic suits of various seasons contrasted with the new shirts inside (also, observe how the colors pop):

I just liked the way this leather coat was so ridiculously slim:



1.Burberry

While there's not too much story here, there are theatrical elements in the set; the leaves definitely fit with the clothes (and the season). The collection does, however have a sophisticated level of coherence through its use of pattern, bags, and hats. Also, I would wear EVERYTHING from this collection, and I would encourage you to do so as well.

A gorgeous pea-coat in brown:

The color combinations of this look are soft, harmonious, and look at that cardigan!

Of course, there has to be a suit:

I'm not sure what kind of material this coat is made out of, but it interests me. It seems almost plastic, especially in the way it crinkles:

This sweater. That bow tie. The hats. Amazing:



The best: Emanuel Ungraro

The best synthesis of drama, innovation, coherence and taste. Ungaro, we salute you!

The gypsy wanderer with the cane starts and ends the show (coherence!). Also the draping in this look is key.

The layering in this look is amazing. In addition, every garment this model wears is gorgeous.


Here we have an answer to the return of high-waisted womens pants. And they're done so well! This look works because of the short jacket, and the cravat. Nothing but good things:

Again, we see the strongest, most sophisticated articulation of the new Silhouette with Ungaro:


Here is our gypsy friend to finish the show in his cloth belt, still carrying his cane, modeling those fantastic high-waisted dress-pants. Nothing but ecstasy, here.




Most Dissapointing: Dior Homme

Cathy Horyn (god bless the girl) said it best:

"[The clothes] showed, in fact, a lack of expert judgment. If the purpose in using high-collared shirts (with dickies sometimes under them) was to extend the line of the black suits — to make the models look taller — why, then, did they look short and rather squat? The answer is the jackets stopped short of the belt line, squaring off their bodies, and the slim trousers were made of a stretch fabric, exposing musculature in a way that wasn’t, well, couture."

Gross, squat-model-making jacket pictured below:

Might I add, this butterfly motif was never readdressed throughout the rest of the show (poor coherence!):

I guess Van Asche didn't get the memo on how to tame the new silhouette (If you're not sure either, see previous post "Trendwatch '08 MEN") :

...Huh?

Is there any reason for this?

Hedi Slimane, we miss you.

See Horyn's full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/22/fashion/shows/22PARIS.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=quote+the+classics&st=nyt&oref=slogin



But let's end on a pleasant note, shall we? Our gypsy friend will send us on our way: